Educational Research and Reviews

  • Abbreviation: Educ. Res. Rev.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1990-3839
  • DOI: 10.5897/ERR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 2009

Full Length Research Paper

Co-educational tutorial classes and their significance on gendered test scores of Wollo University students: A before-after analyses

Mu?uz Gidey
  • Mu?uz Gidey
  • Wollo University, Ethiopia
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 17 May 2015
  •  Accepted: 31 July 2015
  •  Published: 10 August 2015

References

Booth AL, Cardona-Sosa L, Nolen P (2013). Do Single-Sex Classes Affect Exam Scores? An Experiment in a Coeducational University. Discussion Paper No. 7207. Germany: Bonn: IZA.

 

Booth AL, Cardona‐Sosa L, Nolen P (2013). Do Single‐Sex Classes Affect Achievement? An Experiment in a Coeducational University. J. Educ. Res. 1(2).

 

Babbie E (2010). The practice of social research: 12th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

 

Hoffman BA (2008). The Effect of Single-Sex Instruction in a Large, Urban, At-Risk High School. J. Educ. Res. 102(1):1-50.
Crossref

 

Cothari C (2004). Research Methodology. New Delhi, India: New age international (p) limited, publishers.

 

Cresswell J (2003). Research designs: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, 2nded . Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications.

 

Dawson C (2007). A practical guide to research methods 3rd ed. Oxford: How to books Ltd.

 

Pahlke E, Janet Shibley H, Carlie MA (2014). The Effects of Single-Sex Compared With Coeducational Schooling on Students' Performance and Attitudes: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bull. 140(4):1042–1072.
Crossref

 

Lu F, Anderson ML (January 2015). Peer Effects in Microenvironments: The Benefits of Homogeneous Classroom Groups. J. Labor Econ. 33(1):91-122.
Crossref

 

Gleason P (2011). Gender Segregated Learning Environments An Analysis Of The Perceived Impact Of Single-Sex Classrooms In South Carolina. np: University of South Carolina.

 

Hyde J, Mertz J (2009). Gender, culture, and mathematics performance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106(22):8801-8807.
Crossref

 

Lee S (2014). All or Nothing? The Impact of School and Classroom Gender. J. Educ. Learn. Code: I20, I21(24):1-50.

 

Lodico Dean T, Marguerite G, Spaulding, Katherine H Voegtle (2006:11). Methods in Educational Research From Theory to Practice. San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.

 

Rosemary C, Salomone A (2003). Same, Different, Equal: Rethinking Single-Sex Schooling New Haven, CT, No. 304 . Harvard Educational Review. New Haven : Yale University Press.

 

Rosenberg H (December 2006). Effectiveness of an Electronic Histology Tutorial for First-Year Dental Students and Improvement in "Normalized" Test Scores. J. Dental Educ. pp.1339-1345.

 

Saguy T, Quinn D, Dovidio J, Pratto F (2010). Interacting Like a Body: Objectification Can Lead Women to Narrow Their Presence in Social Interactions. Psychological Science.
Crossref

 

Sarantakos S (1993). Social Research. Basingstok : Macmillan.
Crossref

 

Smyth E (2010 ). single-sex education: What does Research Tell us? Revue française de pédagogie 171 avril-mai-juin, 47-55.

 

Yong E (2010, January 12, 9:30 am). Discover: Science for the Curious: How objectification silences women – the male glance as a psychological muzzle .  

view

 

Yong E (2009a). June 1, 4:51 pm.). Discover: Science for the Curious: Gender gap in maths driven by social factors, not biological differences. 

view

 

Yong E (2009b). June 23, 12:00 pm). Discover: Science for the Curious:Hidden beliefs in science stereotypes predict size of gender gap across 34 countries.

view