Akyol Z, Garrison DR (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. J. Asynchronous Learn. Network 12:3-22.

Andersen JF (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In: D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 3 (pp. 543-559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

Andersen JF, Andersen PA, Jensen AD (1979). The measurement of nonverbal immediacy. J. Appl. Commun. Res. 7:153-180.
Crossref

Arbaugh JB, Cleveland-Innes M, Diaz S, Garrison DR, Ice P, Richardson J, Swan KP (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet Higher Educ. 11:133-136.
Crossref

Argyle M, Dean J (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry 28(3):289-304.
Crossref

Arminen I, Weilenmann A (2009). Mobile presence and intimacy- reshaping social actions in mobile contextual configuration. J. Pragmatics 41(10):1905-1923.
Crossref

Bente G, Rüggenberg S, Krämer NC, Eschenburg F (2008). Avatar-mediated networking: Increasing social presence and interpersonal trust in net-based collaborations. Human Commun. Res. 34(2):287-318.
Crossref

Bigley HA (2012). The awareness of computer-mediated communication's social presence for virtual high school students. (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.

Biocca F (1997). The cyborg's diliemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Cognitive Technology Humanizing the Information Age.
Crossref

Biocca F, Harms C, Burgoon JK (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence 12(5):456-480.
Crossref

Biocca F, Harms C, Gregg J (2001). The networked minds measure of social presence: Pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. Paper presented at the Paper presented at Fourth Presence International Workshop, Philadelphia, PA. PMid:11168360

Biocca F, Nowak K (2001). Plugging your body into the telecommunication system: Mediated embodiment, media interfaces, and social virtual environments. In: C. L. D. Atkin (Ed.), Communication technology and society (pp. 407-447). Waverly Hill, VI: Hampton Press.

Blocher JM (1997). Self-regulation of strategies and motivation to enhance interaction and social presence in computer-mediated communication from (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Database. (NO. 739772771)

Broom ME (1993). Integrative literature reviews for the development of concepts. In: B. L. Rodgers & K. A. Knafl (Eds.), Concept Development in Nursing (2nd ed., pp.231–250). Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Co.

Burgess M, Slate J, Rojas-LeBouef A, LaPrairie K (2010). Teaching and learning in Second Life: Using the community of inquiry (CoI) model to support online instruction with graduate students in instructional technology. Internet Higher Educ. 13(1-2):84-88.
Crossref

Buxton WAS (1993). Telepresence: Integrating shared task and person spaces. In: R. M. Baecker (Ed.), Readings in Groupware and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Caspi A, Blau I (2008). Social presence in online discussion groups: Testing three conceptions and their relations to perceived learning. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 11(3):323-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9054-2
Crossref

Chen CC, Olfman L, Harris A (2005). Differential impacts of social presence on the behavior modeling approach. Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interaction 1(2):64-84.
Crossref

Cobb SC (2009). Social presence and online learning: A current view from a research perspective. J. Interactive Online Learn. 8(3):241-254.

Collins MP, Murphy KL (1997). Development of communication conventions in instructional electronic chats. J. Distance Educ. 12(1-2):177-200.

Conceicao SC, Schmidt SW (2010). How non-content related forums influence social presence in the online learning environment. Indian J. Open Learn. 19(2):73-85.

Cooper HM (1998). Synthesizing research : A guide for literature reviews applied social research methods series (3rd ed. Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cortese J, Seo M (2012). The role of social presence in opinion expression during FtF and CMC discussions. Commun. Res. Rep. 29(1):44-53.
Crossref

Creswell JW (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Daft RL, Lengel RH (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. In: B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Res. Organ. Behav. pp.191-233. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

De Wever B, Schellens T, Valcke M, Van Keer H (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Comput. Educ. 46(1):6-28.
Crossref

Diaz SR, Swan K, Ice P, Kupczynski L (2010). Student ratings of the importance of survey items, multiplicative factor analysis, and the validity of the community of inquiry survey. Internet Higher Educ. 13(1-2):22-30.
Crossref

Doran JF (2010). Breaking the silence: A phenomenological study of the effects of asynchronous voice conferencing on the formation of identity, coummunity and presence in online learning. (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.

DuVall J, Powell MR, Hodge E, Ellis M (2007). Text messaging to improve social presence in online learning. Educ. Q. 30(3):24-28.

Garrison DR (1997). Computer conferencing: The post-industrial age of distance education. Open Learn. 12(2):3-11.
Crossref

Garrison DR (2011). E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.

Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet Higher Educ. 2(2-3):87-105.
Crossref

Garrison DR, Cleveland-Innes M, Fung TS (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet Higher Educ. 13(1-2):31-36.
Crossref

Gefen D, Straub DW (1997). Gender differences in perception and adoption of e-mail: An extension to the Technology Acceptance Model. MIS Q. 21(4):389-400.
Crossref

Giesbers B, Rienties B, Gijselaers WH, Segers M, Tempelaar DT (2009). Social presence, Web videoconferencing and learning in virtual teams. Industry Higher Educ. 23(4):301-309(309).
Crossref

Goffman E (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

Gorham J (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Educ. 37(1):40-53.
Crossref

Gramling JL (2003). Students' experiences of the social environment and social presence in campus-based and web-based education. (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.

Gunawardena CN, Zittle FJ (1996). An examination of teaching and learning process in distance education and implications for designing instruction. In M. F. Beaudoin (Ed.), Distance Education Symposium 3: Instruction (pp. 51-63). University Park, PA: American Center for the Study of Distance Education.

Gunawardena CN, Zittle FJ (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. Am. J. Distance Educ. 11(3):8-26.
Crossref

Hackman MZ, Walker KB (1990). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Educ. 39(3):196-209.
Crossref

Heeter C (1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence 1(2):262-271.

Hernandez RJ (2008). Development and validation of an instrument to predict online student success using faculty perceptions. (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.

Hodge EM, Tabrizi M, Farwell MA, Wuensch KL (2008). Virtual reality classrooms: Strategies for creating a social presence. Int. J. Social Sci. 2(2):105-109.

Homer BD, Plass JL, Blake L (2008). The effects of video on cognitive load and social presence in multimedia-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3):786-797.
Crossref

Hwang H (2007). Development of social presence measurement of mediated social interaction: a case study of instant messaging. Communication Sci. Stud. 7(2):529-561.

Jin SAA (2011). "It feels right. therefore, i feel present and enjoy": The effects of regulatory fit and the mediating roles of social presence and self-presence in avatar-based 3d virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 20(2):105-116.
Crossref

Kearney P, Plax T, Wendt-Wasco N (1985). Teacher immediacy for affective learning in divergent colleges classes. Communication Q. 3(1):61-74.
Crossref

Kehrwald BA (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Educ. 29(1):89-106.
Crossref

Kehrwald BA (2010). Being online: Social presence as subjectivity in online learning. London Rev. Educ. 8(1):39-50.
Crossref

Kekwaletswe RM (2007). Social presence awareness for knowledge transformation in a mobile learning environment. Int. J. Educ. Development using Information Communication Technol. 3(4):102-109.

Kim E (2005). The effects of digital audio on social presence, motivation and perceived learning in asynchronous learning networks. (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database.

Kim J, Kwona Y, Cho D (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers Educ. 57(2):1512-1520.
Crossref

Kreijns K, Kirschner PA, Jochems W (2011). Measuring perceived social presence in distributed learning groups. Educ. Infor. Technol. 16(4):365-381.
Crossref

Leh ASC (2001). Computer-mediated communication and social presence in a distance learning environment. Int. J. Educ. Telecommunication, 7(2):109-128.

Leong P (2011). Role of social presence and cognitive absorption in online learning environments. Distance Education, 32(1):5-28.
Crossref

Lombard M, Ditton T (1997, September). At the heart of it all: The conecept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2).
Crossref

Lombard M, Snyder-Duch J, Bracken CC (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Hum. Communication Res. 28(4):587-604.
Crossref

Lowenthal PR (2010). The evolution and influence of social presence theory on online learning. In T. T. Kidd (Ed.), Online education and adult learning: New frontiers for teaching practices (pp. 124-134). Hershey: IGI Global.
Crossref

Lyons A, Reysen S, Pierce L (2012). Video lecture format, student technological efficacy, and social presence in online courses. Computers Human Behav. 28(1):181-186.
Crossref

Martin J (1981). Telematic Society: a challenge for tomorrow. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.

Mason R (1994). Using communications media in open and flexible learning. London: Kogan Page.

McKerlich R, Anderson T (2007). Community of inquiry and learning in immersive environments. J. Asynchronous Learn. Networks 11(4):35-52.

McLellan H (1999). Online education as interactive experience: Some guiding models. Editorial, Educ. Technol. 39(5):36-42.

McLeod PL, Baron RS, Marti MW, Yoon K (1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer mediated group discussion. J. Appl. Psychol. 82(5):706-718.
Crossref

Mehrabian A (1971). Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadswort.

Menzie KA (1991). Building online relationships: Relationship marketing and social presence as foundations for a university library blog. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Doctoral dissertation).

Newberry B (2001). Raising student social presence in online classes. Paper presented at the WebNet 2001 World Conference on the WWW and the Internet, Norfolk, VA.

Nowak K, Biocca F (2001). Understanding the influence of agency and anthropomorphism on copresence, social presence and physical presence with virtual humans. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5):481-494.
Crossref

Palmer M (1995). Interpersonal communication and virtual reality: Mediating interpersonal relationships. In: F. Biocca & M. Levy (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp.277-299). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Plax TG, Kearney P, McCroskey JC, Richmond VP (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Commun. Educ. 35(1):43-55.
Crossref

Rafaeli S (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In: R. P. Hawkins, S. Pingree & J. Weimann (Eds.), Advancing Communication Science: Sage Annual Review of Communication Research (Vol. 16, pp. 110-134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Rafaeli S (1990). Interaction with media: Parasocial interaction and real interaction. In: B. D. Ruben & L. A. Lievrouw (Eds.), New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books. Informat. Behav. 16:125-181.

Richardson JC, Swan K (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. J. Asynchronous Learn. Networks 7(1):68-88.

Richmond VP, Gorham JS, McCrosky J (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In: M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Commun. Yearbook 10:574-590.

Rourke L, Anderson T, Garrison DR, Archer W (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferencing. J. Distance Educ. 14(3):51-70.

Sallnäs E, Rassmus-Gröhn K, Sjöström C (2000). Supporting presence in collaborative environments by haptic force feedback. AMC Transactions on human-computer interaction, 7(4):461-476.
Crossref

Salloum SR (2011). Student perceptions of computer-mediated communication tools in online learning: Helpfulness and effects on teaching, social, and cognitive presence. (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.

Savicki V, Kelley M (2000). Computer mediated communication: Gender and group composition. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 3(5):817-826.
Crossref

Shen KN, Khalifa M (2008). Exploring multi-dimensional conceptualization of social presence in the context of online communities. Int. J. Human-Computer Interaction 24(7):722-748.
Crossref

Crossref

Shen KN, Yu AY, Khalifa M. (2010). Knowledge contribution in virtual communities: accounting for multiple dimensions of social presence through social identity. Behav. Information Technol. 29(4):337-348.
Crossref

Shin N (2002). Beyond Interaction: The relational construct of transactional presence. Open Learn. 17(2):121-137.
Crossref

Short J, Williams E, Christie B (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York, NY: Wiley.

Sproull L, Kiesler S (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Manage. Sci. 32(11):1492-1512.
Crossref

Steinman DC (2010). Social interactions within a web 2.0 learning environment: The impact on learner social presence. (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.

Swan K (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: the importance of interaction. Educ. Communication Infor. 2(1):23-49.
Crossref

Swan K (2003). Developing social presence in online discussions. In: S. Naidu (Ed.), Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices. London: Kogan Page pp.147-164.

Swan K, Shih LF (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. J. Asynchronous Learn. Networks 9(3):115-136.

Swider SM (2002). Outcome effectiveness of community health workers: an integrative literature review. Public Health Nurs. 19(1):11-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-446.2002.19003.x PMid:11841678

Tourangeau R, Couper MK, Steiger DM (2003). Humanizing self-administered surveys: experiments on social presence in web and IVR surveys. Computers Hum. Behav. 19(1):1-24.
Crossref

Trevino LK, Lengel RH, Daft RL (1987). Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations. Commun. Res. 14(5):553-574.
Crossref

Tu CH (2000). Strategies to increase interaction in online social learning environments. In D. A. Willis, J. Price & J. Wills (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1662-1667). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

Tu CH (2002). The relationship between social presence and online privacy. Internet Higher Educ. 5(4):293-318.
Crossref

Crossref

Tu CH, McIsaac M (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. Am. J. Distance Educ. 16(3):131-150.
Crossref

Tu CH, Yen CJ (2006). A study of multidimensional online social presence. In L. W. Cooke (Ed.), Frontiers in higher education (pp. 77-104). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science. PMid:16776836

Tung FW, Deng YS (2006). Designing social presence in e-learning environments: Testing the effect of interactivity on children. Interactive Learn. Environ. 14(3):251-264.
Crossref

Van Baren J, IJsselsteijn W (2004). Measuring presence: A guide to current measurement approaches.

Vaughan ND (2004). Technology in Support of Faculty Learning Communities. In M. D. Cox & L. Richlin (Eds.), Building Faculty Learning Communities: New Directions for Teaching and Learning, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. pp. 101-109.
Crossref

Crossref

Walther JB (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Commun. Res. 19(1):52-90.
Crossref

Wanstreet CE, Stein DS (2011). Presence over time in synchronous communities of inquiry. Am. J. Distance Educ. 25(3):162-177.
Crossref

Weinel M, Bannert M, Zumbach J, Hoppe HU, Malzahn N (2011). A closer look on social presence as a causing factor in computer-mediated collaboration. Computers Hum. Behav. 27(1):513-521.
Crossref

Whiteman JAM (2002). Interpersonal communication in computer mediated learning.

Wiener M, Mehrabian A (1968). Language within Language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Wulff S, Hanor J, Bulik RJ (2000). The roles and interrelationships of presence, reflection, and self-directed learning in effective World Wide Web-based pedagogy. In: R. A. Cole (Ed.), Issues in web-based pedagogy: A critical primer, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press pp.143-160.