Andruff H, Carraro N, Thompson A, Gaudreau P, Louvet B (2009). Latent class growth modelling: A tutorial.Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychol. 5(1):11‐24.

Bandura A (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Bollen KA, Curran PJ (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. New Jersey: A John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publication.

Byrne BM, Stewart SM (2006). The MACS approach to testing for multigroup invariance of a second – order structure: A walk through the process. Structural Equating Modeling, 13(2):287-321.
Crossref

Capa Y, Cakiroglu J, Sarikaya H (2005). The development and validation of a Turkish version of teachers' sense of efficacy scale. Egitim ve Bilim (Education and Science), 30(137):74-81.

Curran PJ, Muthén BO (1999). The application of latent curve analysis to testing developmental theories in intervention research. Am. J. Community Psychol. 27:567‐595.
Crossref

Drasgow F (1987). Study of the measurement bias of two standardized psychological tests. J. Appl. Psychol. 72:19-29.
Crossref

Duncan TE, Duncan SC (2004). An introduction to latent growth curve modeling. Behavior Therapy, 35(2):333-363.
Crossref

Dural S, Somer O, Korkmaz M, Can S, ÖÄŸretmen T (2011). Ä°kinci Drerece Örtük GeliÅŸme Modelleri ve Ölçme EÅŸdeÄŸerliÄŸi. EÄŸitim ve Bilim, 36(161):51-63.

Fraine BD, Damme JV, Onghena P (2007). A longitudinal analysis of gender differences in academic self-concept and language achievement: A multivariate multilevel latent growth approach. Contemporary Educ. Psychol. 32(1):132-150. 
Crossref

Ferrer E, Balluerka N, Widaman KF (2008). Factorial invariance and the specification of the second-order latent growth models. Methodology 4:22-36.
Crossref

Hancock GR, Kuo W, Lawrence FR. (2001). An illustration of second-order latent growth models. Structural Equation Modeling 8(3):470-489.
Crossref

Horn JL, McArdle JJ, Mason R. (1983). When is invariance not invariant: A practical scientist's look at the ethereal concept of factor invariance. Southern Psychologist 1:179-188.

Kim ES, Willson VL (2014). Measurement Invariance Across Groups in Latent Growth Modeling, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary J. 21(3):408-424 
Crossref

Kline RB (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.

McArdle JJ (1988). Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data. In: R. B.Cattel & J. Nesselroade (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp.561–614). New York: Plenum.
Crossref

McArdle JJ, Epstein D (1987). Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models. Child Dev. 58:110-133.
Crossref

Meredith WM (1964). Notes on factorial invariance. Psychometrika 29:177-185.
Crossref

Meredith WM (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika 58:525-543.
Crossref

Meredith W, Tisak J (1984). "Tuckerizing" curves. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society July, Santa Barbara, CA.

Meredith W, Tisak J (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55:107-122.
Crossref

Mulholland J, Wallace J (2001). Teacher induction and elementary science teaching: enhancing self-efficacy. Teach. Teacher Educ. 17:243-261.
Crossref

Muthén B (1991). Analysis of longitudinal data using latent variable models with varying parameters. In: L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for analysis of change. Washington DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. pp. 1-17.
Crossref

Preacher K, Wichman A, MacCallum R, Briggs N (2008). Latent Growth Curve Modeling, Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, SAGE Publications, Califonria

Rao CR (1958). Some statistical methods for the comparison of growth curves. Biometrics 14:1-17.
Crossref

Sayer AG, Cumsille PE (2001). Second-order latent growth models. In: Collins, LM.; Sayer, AG., editors. New methods for the analysis of change. Washington, D. C.: Am. Psychol. Assoc. pp. 179-200.
Crossref

Sessoms J, Finney Sara J (2015). Measuring and modeling change in examinee effort on low-stakes tests across testing occasions. Int. J. Testing 15(4):356-388, 
Crossref

Scholz U, Gutierrez-Dona B, Sud S, Schwarzer R (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. Euro. J. Psychol. Assessment 18(3):242-251.
Crossref

Stoel RD, van den Wittenboer G, Hox JJ (2004). Methodological issues in the application of the latent growth curve model. In: van Montfort, K.; Oud, H.; Satorra, A., editors. Recent developments on structural equation modeling: Theory and applications. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Press pp. 241-262.
Crossref

Tschannen-Moran M, Woolfolk Hoy A (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teacher Educ. 17(7):783-805.
Crossref

Tucker LR (1958). Determination of parameters of a functional relation by factor analysis. Psychometrika 23:19-23.
Crossref

Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods 3:4-69.
Crossref

Welch GW (2007). Model fit and interpretation of non-linear latent growth curve models. Unpublished dissertation thesis, University of Pittsburg.

Widaman KF, Reise SP (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In: Bryant, KJ. Windle, M.; West, SG., editors. The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; pp. 281-324.

Wu AD, Li Z, Zumbo BD (2007). Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment, Res. Eval. 12:1-26.