Educational Research and Reviews

  • Abbreviation: Educ. Res. Rev.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1990-3839
  • DOI: 10.5897/ERR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 2007

Full Length Research Paper

The use of cartoons in elementary classrooms: An analysis of teachers’ behavioral intention in terms of gender

Emin Ibili*
  • Emin Ibili*
  • Department of Computer Education and Educational Technology, Faculty of Education, Gazi University, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar
Sami Sahin
  • Sami Sahin
  • Department of Computer Education and Educational Technology, Faculty of Education, Gazi University, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 04 February 2015
  •  Accepted: 23 February 2016
  •  Published: 23 April 2016

References

Agarwal R, Karahanna E (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. pp. 665-694.
Crossref

 

Anderson EJ, Schwager PH (2005). SME adoption of wireless lan technology: applying the UTAUT model. Proceeding of the 7th Conference of the Southern Association for Information Systems.

 

Baker EW, Al-Gahtani SS, Hubona GS (2007). The effects of gender and age new technology implementation in a developing country: Testing the theory of planned behavior (TPB), Infor. Technol. People 20(4):352-375.
Crossref

 

Bandura A (1971). Social learning theory. Stanford University Press.

 

Barak M, Ashkar T, Dori YJ (2011). Learning science via animated movies: Its effect on students' thinking and motivation. Computers Educ. 56(3):839-846.
Crossref

 

Bagozzi RP (2007). The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift. J. Association Inform. Syst. 8(4):3.

 

Bunz U, Curry C, Voon W (2007). Perceived versus actual computer-email-web fluency. Computers Hum. Behavior 23(5):2321-2344.
Crossref

 

Bulbul T, Cuhadar C (2011). Evaluation of policies related with technology use Turkish Educational System. VI. Balkan Education and Science Conference. 29 September-1 October 2011. Skopje, Macedonia. pp. 423-428.

 

Burton-Jones A, Hubona GS (2006). The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Infor. Manage. 43(6):706-717.
Crossref

 

Chen S, Li S, Li C (2011). Recent related research in technology acceptance model: A literature review Austr. J. Bus. Manage. Res. 1(9):124-127.

 

Cheng JMS, Sheen GJ, Lou GC (2006), Consumer acceptance of the internet as a channel of distribution in Taiwan - A Channel Function Perspective, Technovation, 26(7):856-864.
Crossref

 

Chiangtong P (2518). Literary for Children. Bangkok; Gim-nguan Printing. pp. 45-46.

 

Cho H (2012). The use of cartoons as teaching a tool in Middle School Mathematics, PhD Thesis. Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.

 

Collis B, Moonen J (2008). Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: Quality perspectives. Educational Media International 45(2):93-106.
Crossref

 

Conole G, Alevizou P (2010). A literature review of the use of Web 2.0 tools in higher education. A report commissioned by the Higher Education Academy.

 

Davis FD (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 38:319-340.
Crossref

 

Dhangsubhuti R (2006). The animated cartoon viewing habits and behavior of children in saeng arun dhonburi school. Independent study, Doctoral dissertation, Kasetsart University.

 

Doring A (2002). The use of cartoons as a teaching and learning strategy with adult learners. New Zealand J. Adult Learn. 30(1):56-62.

 

Dougherty AJ (2002). Deciphering the origin and evolution of a paraglacial barrier, Castle Neck, Massachusetts, Unpublished Master Thesis, Department of Earth Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA.

 

Elmas R, Geban O (2012). Web 2.0 tools for 21st century teachers. Int. Online J. Educ. Sci. 4(1):243-254.

 

Ertmer P (1999). Addressing first and second-order barriers to change. Strategies for technology implementation. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 47(4):47-61.
Crossref

 

Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

 

Gefen D, Straub DW (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of E-Mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Q. 21(4):389-400.
Crossref

 

George D, Mallery M (2010). Using SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

 

Gunes G, Baki A (2011). Reflections from application of the fourth grade mathematics course curriculum. HU, J. Educ. 41(41).

 

Hawkins L, Davidson M (2007). Engaging English, literacy, media and art curriculum, outcomes. Educ. Technol. Guide 15:60-63.

 

Igbaria M, Zinatelli N, Cragg PB, Cavaye ALM (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model, MIS Q. 21(3):279-305.
Crossref

 

Ince M (1991). Cartoons' role and importance of the 6-18 age group individuals in their life. Unpublished master's thesis. Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

 

Irkin (2012). Television and its effects on the process of the development of children, Master Theses, The Radio and Television Supreme Council, Ankara, Turkey.

 

Andris J (1996). The relationship of indices of students navigational patterns in a hypermedia geology lab simulation to two measures of learning style. J. Educ. Multimedia Hypermedia, 15:303-315.

 

Keoght N, Naylor S, Eilson C (1998). Concept cartoons: A new perspective on physics education, Phys. Educ. 33(4):220-224.

 

Koszalka TA (2000). Effect of computer mediated communications on teachers' attitudes toward using Web resources in the classroom. J. Instructional Psychol. 28(2):95-103.

 

Lai VS, Li H (2005). Technology accaptance model for internet banking: an invariance analysis, Infor. Manage. 42:373-386.
Crossref

 

Lin PC, Lu HK, Liu SC (2013). Towards an education behavioral intention model for elearning systems: An extension of UTAUT. J. Theoretical Appl. Infor. Technol. 47(3):1200-1207.

 

Ma WW, Anderson R, Streith KO (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: an empirical study of student teachers, J. Comput. Assisted Learn. 21:387-395.
Crossref

 

Macgillivray LK (2011). Using cartoons to teach students about stereotypes and discrimination: one teacher's lessons from south park, J. Curriculum and Pedagogy 2(1):133-147.
Crossref

 

Mayer RE, Heiser J, Lonn S (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. J. Educ. Psychol. 93(1):187-198.
Crossref

 

Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2002). How to use a monte carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9:599-620.
Crossref

 

Ningsih ZW, Sari MP (2012). Teaching writing paragraph through please strategy at junior high school. e-J. Mahasiswa Prodi Pend Bahasa Inggris 1(4).

 

Nunnally JC (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill

 

Rosen LD, Weil MM (1995). Computer availability, computer experience and technophobe among public school teachers. Computers Hum. Behav. 11(11):9-31.
Crossref

 

Saade R, Bahli B (2005). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model, Inform. Manage. 42(2):317-327.
Crossref

 

Sánchez RA, Hueros AD (2010). Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers Hum. Behav. 26(6):1632-1640.
Crossref

 

Shipps B, Phillips B (2013). Social networks, interactivity and satisfaction: assessing socio-technical behavioral factors as an extension to technology acceptance. J. Theoret. Appl. Electronic Commerce Res. 8(1):35-52.
Crossref

 

Singer DG, Singer JL (1980). Television viewing and aggressive behavior in preschool children: a field study. Annals of the New York Acad. Sci. 347(1):289-303.
Crossref

 

Sinor MZ (2011). Comparison between conventional health promotion and use of cartoon animation in delivering oral health education. Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 1(3):169-174.

 

Teo TSH, Lim VKG, Lai RYC (1999). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Internet Usage, Omega 27(1):25-37.
Crossref

 

Teo T, UrsavaÅŸ ÖF (2012) Technology Acceptance of Pre-Service Teachers in Turkey: Cross-Cultural Model Validation Study. Int. J. Instructional Media 39(3):193-201.

 

Torkzadeh G, Van Dyke TP (2002). Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers Hum. Behav, 18(5):479-494.
Crossref

 

Türkmen N (2012). Carton film's cultural role in the transmission and Pepee. Cumhuriyet University, J. Soc. Sci. 36(2).

 

Wyk V, Micheal M (2011). The use of cartoons as a teaching tool to enhance student learning in economics education. J. Soc. Sci. 26(2):117-130.

 

Venkatesh V (1999). Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation, MIS Q. 23(2):239-260.
Crossref

 

Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies, Manage. Sci. 46(2):186-208.
Crossref

 

Venkatesh V (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating perceived behavioral control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model. Infor. Syst. Res. 11:342-365.
Crossref

 

Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis FD (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Q. 27(3):425-478.

 

Yi MY, Jackson JD, Park JS, Probst JC (2006). Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: toward an integrative view. Inform. Manage. 43(3):350-363.
Crossref

 

Yorulmaz (2013). Research on the animated movie "Pepee" according to religious and values education, J. Int. Soc. Res. 6(24).