Educational Research and Reviews

  • Abbreviation: Educ. Res. Rev.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1990-3839
  • DOI: 10.5897/ERR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 2008

Full Length Research Paper

Teachers’ development model to authentic assessment by empowerment evaluation approach

Charin Charoenchai1*
  • Charin Charoenchai1*
  • 1Department of Education Research and Development, Faculty of Education, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.
  • Google Scholar
Songsak Phuseeorn1
  • Songsak Phuseeorn1
  • 1Department of Education Research and Development, Faculty of Education, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.
  • Google Scholar
Waro Phengsawat2
  • Waro Phengsawat2
  • 2Department of Education Administration, Faculty of Education, Rajabhat Sakhonnakhon University Thailand, 47000.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 28 April 2015
  •  Accepted: 09 September 2015
  •  Published: 15 September 2015

References

Chalasthian B (2007).Authentic Assessment in Classroom.[Online]. 
 
Department of Curriculum and Instruction Development (1999). Authentic Assessment Bangkok: Kurusapha Press.
 
Fetterman D (1993). Empowerment evaluation and accreditation in higher education.in Evaluation for the 21 st. century: A Handbook. Editors by Chelimsky E. and Shadish. W.R. sage Publication, Inc.
 
Fetterman KW (Eds) (1996). Empowerment Evaluation Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment & Accountability.California : Sage.
 

Fetterman D, Wandersman A (1998). Empowerment evaluation: Collaboration, Action Research, and A Case Example. [Online].

view

 
Hart D (1994). Authentic assessment: A handbook for educators. Menlo Park, California; Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
 
Kanchanawasi S (2009). Evaluation Theories7th edition, Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
 
Office of the National Education Commission (1999). National Education Act 1999. Bangkok, Prikwan Graphic Press.
 
Office for National Education Standards and Quality Assessment (2004). National Education Act 1999, Revised 2nd version 2002.Bangkok, Prikwan Graphic Press.
 
Phuviphadavat S (2001). Principle and Technique of Evaluation, Bangkok: Srinakarinwiroj University.
 
Prawanphruek S (2004). Usage of Curriculum of Basic Education: Success, Problems, and Obstacles, Bangkok: Srinakarinwiroj University.
 
Sakulsong P (2001). Understanding Practice and Attitude toward Authentic Assessment of Primary School Teachers in Kalasin Province, Master thesis, Mahasarakham University.
 
Sisa-at B (2011). Basic Research9th edition Bangkok : Suviriyasarn.
 
Stufflebeam DL (1994).Empowerment evaluation, Objectivist evaluation, and evaluation standards: where the future of evaluation should not go and where it need to go in Evaluation Practice. Vol.15 No.3.
Crossref
 
Thayotyingyong Y (2007). The teacher Development. [Online]. Available from : http://www.gotoknow.org/blogs/posts/176809 [accessed June 20, 2010].
 
Yothasing A (2003). Understanding Practice and Problems of Authentic Assessment of Teachers in Pilot School and Network Schools Using Basic Education Curriculum 2001, SakolNakhon Primary Schools Office, Master thesis, Mahasarakham University.
 
Wongwanich S (2000). Internal Evaluation in Schools, Bangkok: National Education Commission.
 
Wonggom K (2004). Teachers Development by Empowerment Evaluation in line with National Education Act 1999, Doctoral thesis, Chulalongkorn University.